However, eye pressure control continues to play a major role in the treatment of glaucoma. Today, eye pressure is considered a major risk factor for glaucoma but is not included in the definition of this eye disease. In addition, patients with high eye pressure sometimes do not experience any pain and do not have any glaucoma symptoms. However, doctors gradually came to understand that glaucoma can occur even when eye pressure is normal, which sometimes makes it harder to diagnose. ![]() Historically, glaucoma was identified as a disease in which the eye was firm or hard due to high eye pressure. However, the relationship between glaucoma and eye pressure is complicated and has changed over time. Meaning you can only see through the tiny orb as if it were a normal eye while it is embedded in your eye socket.When people hear the word “glaucoma,” many of them connect the eye disease with elevated eye pressure (also known as intraocular pressure or IOP). While the ersatz eye is embedded in your eye socket, That shown, the only remaining wording of the sentence is this: I would not expect sentences of these sorts (though they are really the same sort) to be written into the standard English rules of 5e. The second, at least for me, is similarly ungrammatical. The first sentence is ungrammatical, and has the same structure as the first case. When eating food, I use a spoon, and I hate forks. While driving home, I saw a dog, and I hate cats. However, the first structure is ungrammatical in English and the following show this: The question is which of the following it actually is: There are very few Common items which require attunement in 5e, though, and the only directly comparable ones seem to be from Eberron. I can't say if it fits the power of a Common magic item, though. Its power would be handily limited by the requirements for attunement - if it's left somewhere for spying purposes, the user would have to be within 100 feet of it at least once every 24 hours. It seems to me that this ability is commensurate with an attunement slot in 5e. Is there any reason to conclude that the eye cannot be seen through while it is removed from the user's head? However, I believe that rules of English grammar alone will not suffice to resolve this. If there was no comma before "and", or if there was a semicolon instead of a comma, then it would be a different matter. There are other ways to restructure this sentence with that implication - but there are certainly ways to read it which imply the opposite. This would imply that the user can see through it whether or not it's in their head. "You can see through the tiny orb as though it were a normal eye, and while the ersatz eye is embedded in your eye socket, it can’t be removed by anyone other than you." If we take "and" as joining two independent clauses, then the sentence is equivalent to: However, the sentence is written in what seems to be the most ambiguous way possible. ![]() Upon reading this, my assumption was that a user attuned to it can see through it at all times. While the ersatz eye is embedded in your eye socket, it can’t be removed by anyone other than you, and you can see through the tiny orb as though it were a normal eye. This artificial eye replaces a real one that was lost or removed. The description of the Ersatz Eye from Xanathar's Guide to Everything reads:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |